COVID-19 indemnity for temporary employees in the tourism sector and spas whose work activities have been affected by the epidemiological emergency from COVID-19, provided for by article 2 of the decree of the Minister of Labor and social policies , in agreement with the Minister of Economy and Finance, 13 July 2020, n. 12, implementing article 44 of the decree-law of 17 March 2020, n. 18, converted, with amendments, by law 24 April 2020, n. 27. Management of inquiries relating to any reviews
*** 1. Introduction
With the circular no. 94 of 14 August 2020, the administrative instructions on the subject of the income support allowance were provided, introduced by the decree of the Minister of Labor and Social Policies, in agreement with the Minister of Economy and Finance, 13 July 2020, n. 12 (repertoire no.12 of 14 July 2020), implementing article 44 of the decree-law of 17 March 2020, no. 18, converted, with amendments, by law 24 April 2020, n. 27, in favor of temporary employees in the tourism sector and spas who, as a result of the epidemiological emergency from COVID-19, have ceased, reduced or suspended their activity or their employment relationship. These indemnities amount to € 600 for each of the months of March, April and May 2020. With this message we communicate that the first phase of application management has been completed and the reasons for the rejected applications have been published for not having passed the checks relating to the assessment of the requirements set forth by the current provisions and, consequently, the instructions are provided. for the management of inquiries relating to any reviews. The results of all the applications and, for the negative ones, the relative reasons, can be consulted in the section of the INPS website called “Covid-19: all services”> “Indemnita 600/1000 euro”, under the heading “Outcomes”, both from part of the patronage with their own credentials is by the citizen with INPS PIN, SPID, CNS and CIE.2. Update of the “Outcomes” function
The legend of the rejections of the COVID-19 indemnity applications (Annex no. 1) has been updated with the results relating to the checks on the applications provided for in the circular mentioned in the introduction. In particular, the new rejection outcomes have been introduced, relating to the indemnities in the epigraph, IS_COVID_3M, RDC_3M, STG_TD30 and TD_30. 3. Organizational aspects for the management of requests for re-examination of rejected applications
For these questions, the outcome has been communicated to the citizen and to the patronage, by displaying the reasons for rejection under the item “Results” of the “Indemnita 600/1000 euro” service. It was also communicated that any dispute can be carried out through a judicial appeal. In any case, the worker and the Patronage are allowed to propose a request for re-examination of the rejected applications, which allows the INPS to verify in self-defense that the results of the automatic checks have not been affected by the presence of errors or misalignments in the databases. During the definition of the application, the lack of one or more requirements may be detected, each of which is however sufficient to determine by itself the rejection of the application. 4.
Therefore, a term of 20 days is envisaged, starting from the date of publication of this message (or from the knowledge of the rejection if subsequent), to allow for any additional investigation, after which, if the interested party has not produced any useful documentation, the application must be considered rejected. The user can send the documentation through the “Results” link, in the same section of the INPS site in which the “Indemnita 600 / 1.000 euro” application was submitted, thanks to a specific function, which provides to expose the reasons for rejection and allows to attach the documents required for review. Another method of sending the documentation to the competent territorial structure and the dedicated institutional mailbox,, established for each INPS territorial structure. For the purpose of a review of the documentation useful for the administrative review request, please refer to the document attached to this message (Attachment no. 1). 5. Administrative guidelines on reviews
In order to standardize the information and operational indications that the territorial structures must follow in carrying out the reviews, the main instructions are summarized below. The requirements set out in article 2 of the aforementioned inter-ministerial decree, to be cumulatively respected, are the following.
a) Entitlement in the period between 1 January 2019 and 17 March 2020 of one or more fixed-term employment contracts in the tourism and spa sector, with a total duration of at least thirty days (reason for rejection TD_30) . To verify this requirement, the third qualifying element equal to “D” must be checked in Uniemens or in Unilav a “Fixed term” type of contract, relating to one or more employment relationships in tourism companies and spas whose ATECO code is included in the table indicated in paragraph 1 of circular no. 94/2020. The total duration of at least 30 days must be checked, alternatively, taking into account the “start date” and “end date” fields valued in Uniemens complaints or in Unilav communications relating to employment relationships with qualification “D” at companies with ATECO in tourism and spas. It should be noted that self-employed entertainment workers (qualifications with first “S” character) and self-employed professional sports workers (qualifications with first “U” character) are excluded from the indemnity.
b) Entitlement in the year 2018 of one or more fixed-term employment contracts or with the qualification of seasonal workers in the tourism and spas sector, with a total duration of at least thirty days (reason for rejection STG_TD30). To verify this requirement, the third qualifying element equal to “D”, “S”, “G” or “T” must be checked alternatively in Uniemens or in Unilav a type of contract “Fixed term” or the presence of the field “seasonal work = YES” in relation to one or more employment relationships in tourism companies and spas whose ATECO code is included in the table indicated in paragraph 1 of circular no. 94/2020. The total duration of at least 30 days must be verified, alternatively, taking into account the “start date” and “end date” fields entered in the Uniemens complaints or in the Unilav communications relating to employment relationships with qualification “D”, “S”, “G” or “T” at companies with ATECO of the tourism and spas. It should be noted that in order to prevent requests for re-examination by subjects who had already submitted an application as seasonal workers in the sector in question, these requests were centrally generated ex officio for those whose application was rejected for qualification different from seasonal. “S”, “G” or “T” at companies with ATECO of tourism and spas. It should be noted that in order to prevent requests for re-examination by subjects who had already submitted an application as seasonal workers in the sector in question, these requests were centrally generated ex officio for those whose application was rejected for qualification different from seasonal. “S”, “G” or “T” at companies with ATECO of tourism and spas. It should be noted that in order to prevent requests for re-examination by subjects who had already submitted an application as seasonal workers in the sector in question, these requests were centrally generated ex officio for those whose application was rejected for qualification different from seasonal.
c) Absence of entitlement, at the time of entry into force of the interministerial decree (14 July 2020) of pension and employment relationship (reason for rejection PENSIONS and LAV_DIP). The applicant must not benefit from a direct pension paid by the AGO (even pro quota), from exclusive, substitute and exempt forms of the pension of the social security institutions referred to in Legislative Decree no. 509/1994 and Legislative Decree n. 103/1996 and the so-called “Social Ape” indemnity paid by the State paid by INPS. In this regard, it should be noted that, where the application with the reason for R-PENSIONI has been rejected, but the citizen submits a request for re-examination as he believes that the pension he owns is compatible or reports that this has been subsequently revoked, the application can be re-examined after appropriate investigations. L’ additional indemnity was also considered incompatible, among other things, with the treatments referred to in articles 19 to 22 of decree-law no. 18/2020. If the applicant has applications authorized for the aforementioned treatments with competence included in the period from 1 March 2020 to 31 May 2020, the application will be rejected in full with the reason for payment IS_COVID_3M. It should be noted that, where it is ascertained that the salary supplement, although previously authorized, has never been paid (for example, due to renunciation or variation of the data initially provided by the company, failure to send the “SR41” form, etc. ) the application can be re-examined with acceptance, unless the legal conditions have remained unchanged.
Vicar General Manager
Vincenzo Caridi
